WHAT DOES THE FUTURE LOOK LIKE AFTER THE CORONAVIRUS?
——————————————–
Development and legal regulation of coercive behavior modification techniques with offenders
RK Schwitzgebel – 1971 – books.google.com
Within the past few years there has been a rapid growth in the experimental study and
application of behavior modification techniques derived from the principles of learning and
technology. These techniques, which have been used primarily in clinical and experimental
settings thus far, create the potential for^ major changes in the arfia_jof corrections. It may be
helpful to compare briefly these techniques with other techniques that have been used
historically to modify the behavior of offenders. The use of coercive techniques to deter or …
development and legal regulation of coercive behavior
Development and Legal Regulations of Coercive Behavior Modifications
Uploaded by
Radovan Dubljevic
Description:
Full description
—————————————————————–
As a caveat, taking it out from scholarily research, according to the book “The Glass House Tapes”, Louis Tackwood, 1973, page 225; mentions the technology that is contained in a Document made available to the Citizens Research Investigative Committee (C.R.I.C.), that was a 92 page monograph. The title was “Development and Legal Regulation of Coercive Behavior Modification Techniques with Offenders.” The Department of Health, Education and Welfare financed this project according to the reference. What does this have to do with our subject matter. Well, after watching the background of HAARP link it with the following. The premise of the H.E.W. project is that social or cultural or even political “rehabilitation” begins inside the nervous system of the person. Quote, “a miniaturized radio transmitter, implanted inside the brain or body, can monitor and transmit the conversations, locations, even the sexual responses of the subject, twenty-four hours per day.” Now, in addition this report also indicated that the a transponder could be sewed up inside a persons body, and a radio controlled electric shock device that would function anywhere in the world. The author was Professor Ralph K. Schwitzgebel of Harvard University; Harvard receives substantial donations from the Rockefellers by the way. Who are the subjects this professor was referring to well, he finally answered in the monograph, “socially troublesome persons.”
The paper also gave a prediction that “microminiaturization” would permit near permanent “intra-cranial stimulation.” It related to civil not criminal thus escaping the 8th Amendment Clause of the Constitution. Finally, I found it very interesting that during the discussion of this technology, a National Security Agency computer specialist proposed attaching miniature electronic tracking devices to 20 Million Americans. The “transponder” would transmit the wearers locations by radio to a computer and could be used “for arrests following riots or confrontations” and “for monitoring aliens and political subgroups.” Even more intriguing was the concept of “Behavioral Engineering.” This guys twin Brother, no less, Old Dr. Robert Schwitzgebel, was urging the government to use the devices to control “GROUP BEHAVIOR.” In other words electrical impulses injected into the brain could induce or inhibit or modify such phenomena as movement, desire, rage, aggression, fear, pain and pleasure. They did experiment on animals and it worked. You could virtually control individuals and groups from a central location. Joseph C. Goulden, who was an investigative journalist did report that a surveillance system was being developed at the time in Tampa, FL. using computers to control a network of video tape recorders and alarms placed in grocery stores, parking lots, warehouses, in high crime areas. STAVS (Sensitized Transmitted Alarm Video System), that had very interesting prospects integrating with other systems. The movement or activity would be observed from specific central locations with an activated light and visual surveillance. I believe according to references at the time, the Behavioral Engineering Plan was developed by Joseph A Meyer who worked at the time for NSA. This was initially aimed at “CRIME” issues.
Anyway, link with this, Chemtrails, and the verichip. So HAARP has multiple uses, and can you imagine the cell phone, Project Blue beam, Holograms, and the technology is very interesting. The missing “scientist” was by the way working with radio waves in his area of expertise.
There was an interview with Stewart Swerdlow (Montauk survivor), I think it was on Coast to Coast, and he mentioned the same technology. He said that satellite ELF broadcasts and remote monitoring were the main tools of these people, and that micro-chipping was kind of like a back-up plan (In case the Sun decides to fry their satellite network. Another link to follow would be NSA + Mind Control and HAARP and another aspect, just for fun, link HAARP with melting polar icecaps or bergs. It would be curious to see any correlations.
————————————
Antony C Sutton Psychotronic Weapons and Behavior Modification
Antony Cyril Sutton (February 14, 1925 – June 17, 2002) was a British and American economist, historian, and writer.
Sutton studied at the universities of London, Göttingen, and California, and received his D.Sc. from the University of Southampton. He was an economics professor at California State University, Los Angeles and a research fellow at Stanford University’s Hoover Institution from 1968 to 1973. During his time at the Hoover Institution, he wrote the major study Western Technology and Soviet Economic Development (in three volumes), arguing that the West played a major role in developing the Soviet Union from its very beginnings up until the present time (1970). Sutton argued that the Soviet Union’s technological and manufacturing base – which was then engaged in supplying the Viet Cong – was built by United States corporations and largely funded by US taxpayers. Steel and iron plants, the GAZ automobile factory – a Ford subsidiary, located in eastern Russia – and many other Soviet industrial enterprises were built with the help or technical assistance of the United States or US corporations. He argued further that the Soviet Union’s acquisition of MIRV technology was made possible by receiving (from US sources) machining equipment for the manufacture of precision ball bearings, necessary to mass-produce MIRV-enabled missiles.
In 1973, Sutton published a popularized, condensed version of the sections of the forthcoming third volume relevant to military technology called National Suicide: Military Aid to the Soviet Union after which he was forced out of the Hoover Institution.[1] His conclusion from his research on the issue was that the conflicts of the Cold War were “not fought to restrain communism”, since the United States, through financing the Soviet Union “directly or indirectly armed both sides in at least Korea and Vietnam”; rather, these wars were organised in order “to generate multibillion-dollar armaments contracts”.[2] The update to this text, The Best Enemy Money Can Buy, looked at the role of military technology transfers up to the 1980s. Appendix B of that text contained the text of his 1972 testimony before Subcommittee VII of the Platform Committee of the Republican Party where he summarized the essential aspects of his overall research: “ In a few words: there is no such thing as Soviet technology. Almost all — perhaps 90-95 percent — came directly or indirectly from the United States and its allies. In effect the United States and the NATO countries have built the Soviet Union. Its industrial and its military capabilities. This massive construction job has taken 50 years. Since the Revolution in 1917. It has been carried out through trade and the sale of plants, equipment and technical assistance.[3] ”
Sutton’s next three major published books — Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution, Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler and Wall Street and FDR — detailed Wall Street’s involvement in the Bolshevik Revolution (in order to destroy Russia as an economic competitor and turn it into “a captive market and a technical colony to be exploited by a few high-powered American financiers and the corporations under their control”[4]) as well as its decisive contributions to the rise of Adolf Hitler and Franklin Delano Roosevelt, whose policies he assessed as being essentially the same, namely “corporate socialism” planned by the big corporations.[5] Sutton concluded that this was all part of the economic power elites’ “long-range program of nurturing collectivism”[2] and fostering “corporate socialism” in order to ensure “monopoly acquisition of wealth”, because it “would fade away if it were exposed to the activity of a free market”.[6] In his view, the only solution to prevent such abuse in the future was that “a majority of individuals declares or acts as if it wants nothing from government, declares it will look after its own welfare and interests”, or specifically that “a majority finds the moral courage and the internal fortitude to reject the something-for-nothing con game and replace it by voluntary associations, voluntary communes, or local rule and decentralized societies”.[2] In Sutton’s own words he was “persecuted but never prosecuted” for his research and subsequent publication of his findings.
In the early 1980s, Sutton used a combination of public-domain information on Skull and Bones (such as Yale yearbooks) and previously unreleased documents sent to him by Charlotte Iserbyt, whose father was a Skull and Bones member,[7] to speculate that it had played an important role in coordinating the political and economic relationships underlying the historical events he (Sutton) wrote of in his previous works. He published his speculations as America’s Secret Establishment: An Introduction to the Order of Skull and Bones — which, according to Sutton, was his most important work.
———————————————————
There Are Dark Days Ahead – James Corbett on Free Man Beyond The Wall
——————————————————–
China’s TERRIFYING Social Credit System
——————————————————–
What Is China’s Social Credit System? | NowThis World
————————————————
A Look Inside China’s Social Credit System | NBC News Now
————————————————
Social Credit: China’s Digital Dystopia In The Making
Leave No Dark Corner: In China, advances in technology are making surveillance techniques more and more sophisticated. Now, a citizen’s most trivial actions – or even, it seems, their ethnicity – can affect their freedom. Subscribe to Journeyman here:
“If people keep their promises they can go anywhere in the world, and if people break their promises they won’t be able to move an inch”, says Cong Jie of credit system Alipay. Facial recognition, security cameras and mobile apps are permitting monitoring of citizens’ every move, using their actions to calculate a ‘score’ based on their perceived merits. Criminal, academic and medical records, even what you buy at the supermarket, are all taken into account. Purchasing alcohol reduces your score, whilst buying nappies increases it. Fan Dandan believes it’s the natural progression of the Party’s policies. “I think it’s always been there”, she says. “Now it’s just in a more efficient format.” Yet injustices appear prevalent. Investigative journalist Liu Hu has found himself labelled ‘dishonest’ and his rights restricted for no apparent legitimate reason. It began after he exposed a corrupt politician.
“There are a lot of people who are on the blacklist wrongly”, he says, “but they can’t get off it”. Reports of racial profiling and unfounded detainment abound, raising serious questions about the motivations behind this new age of totalitarianism.
——————————————–
“There’s no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren’t enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible to live without breaking laws.”
“But just pass the kind of laws that can neither be observed nor enforced or objectively interpreted – and you create a nation of law-breakers – and then you cash in on guilt. Now that’s the system, Mr. Reardon, that’s the game, and once you understand it, you’ll be much easier to deal with.”
Ayn Rand ~ The Atlas Shrugged 1957
[Ayn Rand was mistress to Philip Rothschild. She was tasked by the Illuminati to write the play book for the world Revolutionary plan and put it into a fictional book form and story, but in reality it is exactly their textbook for establishing the world government using fictional characters and storyline but true to the actual strategy]
—————————————
Lenin said, “the way to control the opposition is to control it.”
“The best way to
control the opposition is to lead it ourselves.”
– Vladimir Ilyich Lenin
————————————————————-